Hire a person,
or use QAI?
We’ll lay out the real cost on both sides — including the cases where QAI is the wrong answer.
We’ll lay out the real cost on both sides — including the cases where QAI is the wrong answer.
The bold cell is the stronger side for that row. Neither in bold means it’s a draw. Not every row goes to QAI.
In these three cases we’d tell you to spend the money on a person first.
If the job means measuring, fixing, installing or delivering, someone has to go. QAI can only get the appointment booked.
If you have to see it before you can quote, or the call rests on experience, a system is the wrong tool — a wrong answer costs more.
If a deal is tens or hundreds of thousands and takes several meetings to sign, the customer wants a person. Don’t send a machine to that.
QAI takes the repetitive, time-consuming part — images, video, landing pages, keeping customer records, following up to the process you set. Your staff stop spending their day on that and handle the deals that need talking through.
Images and video, landing pages, customer records, and follow-ups that run to the process you set.
Negotiating price, unhappy customers, site visits, and keeping long-standing relationships.
No extra hire just to answer messages, and more output from the people you have.
That’s a different comparison. What Canva plus spreadsheets plus Zapier actually costs you, and when doing it yourself is genuinely enough, is covered in detail there.
In the session we explain it and run a live demo, so you can hold it against your own numbers. If it isn’t a fit we’ll say so.